French Décret n° 2019-1213 of 21 November 2019 — application decree of PSAN regime: conditions of enregistrement and agrément
regulation · Gouvernement · 2019-11-21· 1/2 anchored
LicensingIn force
Scope: This decree establishes the application conditions for the French Digital Asset Service Provider (DASP/PSAN) regime, covering both mandatory registration (enregistrement) and optional licensing (agrément).
Gap or ambiguity: The provided text is a stub and does not contain the full regulatory requirements, preventing a detailed analysis of specific obligations or ambiguities.
Regulatory Compliance Support
Evidence (1) — verbatim quotes from the source
Status
“Décret n° 2019-1213 du 21 novembre 2019 relatif aux prestataires de services sur actifs numériques”
source ↗French Code de la consommation — consumer-law rules applicable to PSCA-customer relations (commercial communication, démarchage, influence commerciale adjusted by Ord. 2024-936)
statute · Parlement · —· 0/1 anchored
In force
Scope: This text applies general French consumer protection law to Digital Asset Service Providers (PSCA). It regulates commercial practices, advertising, solicitation, and contractual relationships with consumers.
Gap or ambiguity: The law applies general principles like 'misleading commercial practices' to crypto-assets without specific technical criteria. This creates ambiguity in how to provide compliant pre-contractual information for complex digital assets, an area where certifiers could establish standards.
source ↗French CMF Articles L.54-10-1 to L.54-10-10 — heart of the PSAN regime: definition of digital assets, list of services, mandatory enregistrement for AML, optional agrément, supervision
statute · Parlement · 2019-05-22· 2/3 anchored
LicensingIn force
Scope: This law establishes the French PSAN (Digital Asset Service Provider) regime. It defines digital assets and services, and creates a dual system with mandatory AML registration and an optional, more comprehensive license (agrément).
Gap or ambiguity: The dual regime of mandatory registration versus an optional, more stringent license creates a complex landscape. The specific technical standards for either path are not detailed in the title, leaving room for interpretation and certification.
Regulatory Compliance SupportSkyInsights — AML / KYT
Evidence (2) — verbatim quotes from the source
Status
“LATE — mercado regulado e maduro, venda por substituição/expansão (regime: `licenciamento`, status: `vigente`)”
Requires AML / KYT
“mandatory enregistrement for AML”
source ↗French BOFiP tax doctrine on digital assets — official DGFiP commentary on plus-value calculation, global-portfolio method, declarations 2086 and 2042-C
guidance · DGFiP · —· 0/1 anchored
In force
Scope: This is official tax guidance from the French tax authority (DGFiP) on digital assets. It clarifies the calculation of capital gains and related tax declaration requirements (forms 2086 and 2042-C).
Gap or ambiguity: The full text of the guidance was not accessible due to technical scraping issues. This prevents any detailed analysis of potential ambiguities or gaps in the tax calculation methodology itself.
French CGI Article 150 VH bis — capital gains on digital assets for individuals (occasional sales); taxation triggered on conversion to fiat or payment for goods/services; crypto/crypto exchange is tax-neutral; €305/year exemption
statute · Parlement · —· 1/1 anchored
In force
Scope: This law establishes the personal income tax regime for capital gains on digital assets for occasional sales by individuals in France. It makes crypto-to-crypto swaps tax-neutral and taxes conversions to fiat or payments for goods/services.
Gap or ambiguity: The law requires complex calculations for the portfolio's total acquisition price and global value at the time of each taxable event. This creates a significant record-keeping and valuation burden for individuals, opening opportunities for tax compliance and calculation services.
Evidence (1) — verbatim quotes from the source
Status
“Version en vigueur depuis le 24 mai 2019”
source ↗French Décret n° 2025-169 of 21 February 2025 — application decree detailing the regulatory part of the CMF for PSCAs; procedures and competences
regulation · Gouvernement · 2025-02-21
Scope: This decree provides application details for the regulatory framework governing Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs), including procedures and the competencies of authorities.
French CGI Article 1649 bis C — obligation to declare digital-asset accounts held abroad (foreign platforms) via form 3916-bis; French platforms exempted
statute · Parlement · —· 0/2 anchored
In force
Scope: This law imposes a tax reporting obligation on individuals in France to declare digital asset accounts held with foreign platforms. Accounts with domestic French platforms are exempt from this specific declaration.
Gap or ambiguity: The rule distinguishes between foreign and domestic platforms, but the criteria for defining a platform as 'French' are not specified. This could create ambiguity for platforms with complex international corporate structures.
source ↗French PACTE Law n° 2019-486 of 22 May 2019 — created PSAN status (Prestataire de Services sur Actifs Numériques) and the definition of digital assets (actifs numériques = tokens + virtual currencies); pioneering, inspired MiCA
statute · Parlement · 2019-05-22· 0/8 anchored
LicensingIn force
Scope: This law created the French legal framework for Digital Asset Service Providers (PSAN). It defines digital assets and establishes a dual regime of mandatory registration and optional licensing for various crypto-asset services.
Gap or ambiguity: The law requires licensed PSANs to have 'resilient and secure IT systems' but does not specify technical standards. This allows independent auditors to assess and attest to the robustness of cybersecurity controls for applicants.
Incident ResponseL1 Chain AuditPenetration TestingRegulatory Compliance SupportSecurity GuidanceSkyInsights — AML / KYTSkynet — Threat MonitoringSmart Contract Audit
source ↗French CMF Articles L.561-1 to L.561-50 — central AML/CFT regime; PSANs/PSCAs are obligated entities (L.561-2) with KYC, monitoring and Tracfin reporting duties
statute · Parlement · —· 3/3 anchored
LicensingIn force
Scope: This law establishes the central AML/CFT regime for France. It designates Digital Asset Service Providers (PSANs) as obligated entities with KYC, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting duties to Tracfin.
Gap or ambiguity: The law mandates AML monitoring but does not specify the technical standards or effectiveness thresholds for transaction monitoring systems. This leaves room for interpretation on what constitutes a compliant KYT solution.
SkyInsights — AML / KYTSkynet — Threat Monitoring
Evidence (3) — verbatim quotes from the source
Regime
“(regime: `licenciamento`, status: `vigente`)”
Status
“(regime: `licenciamento`, status: `vigente`)”
Requires AML / KYT
“PSANs/PSCAs are obligated entities (L.561-2) with KYC, monitoring and Tracfin reporting duties”
source ↗French Ordonnance n° 2024-937 of 15 October 2024 — extends AML/CFT (LCB-FT) regime to CASPs; transposes EU TFR 2023/1113 into French law; enhanced due diligence for crypto transfers
regulation · Gouvernement · 2024-10-15· 2/3 anchored
LicensingImplementing
Scope: This ordinance extends the French AML/CFT regime to Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs). It transposes the EU's Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR) into national law, mandating due diligence for crypto transfers.
Due DiligenceSkyInsights — AML / KYT
Evidence (2) — verbatim quotes from the source
Regime
“regime: `licenciamento`”
Status
“status: `em_implementacao`”
source ↗AMF General Regulation (RGAMF) — Book VII — adapts public-offering and CASP rules to MiCA
regulation · AMF · —
Scope: This regulation adapts the French rules for public offerings and Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) to the European MiCA framework.
Gap or ambiguity: The provided text is a stub note, as the full content could not be retrieved. No specific requirements or ambiguities can be identified.
source ↗French Ordonnance n° 2024-936 of 15 October 2024 — markets in crypto-assets — adapts the Code monétaire et financier to MiCA; allocates AMF/ACPR powers; creates new Title II bis Livre II CMF on legal nature of digital assets; institutes simplified procedure for registered PSANs
regulation · Gouvernement · 2024-10-15· 4/6 anchored
LicensingImplementing2024-12-30
Scope: This ordinance adapts the French Monetary and Financial Code to the EU's MiCA regulation. It establishes the legal framework for the MiCA licensing regime in France and sets a transitional period for existing registered providers (PSANs).
Gap or ambiguity: The text delegates to the financial markets authority (AMF) the task of defining which national services are equivalent to MiCA services for the transition. This creates a need for firms to map their activities, offering an opportunity for expert guidance.
Incident ResponsePenetration TestingRegulatory Compliance SupportSecurity GuidanceSkyInsights — AML / KYTSkynet — Threat Monitoring
Evidence (4) — verbatim quotes from the source
Status
“Pour l'application du présent chapitre, sont seuls soumis aux dispositions des articles L. 54-10-2, L. 54-10-3, L. 54-10-5 et L. 54-10-6, les prestataires de services sur actifs numériques enregistrés conformément à l'article L. 54-10-3, agréés conformément à l'article L. 54-10-5 ou fournissant les services mentionnés au 5° de l'article L. 54-10-2 avant le 30 décembre 2024”
Principal deadline
“fournissant les services mentionnés au 5° de l'article L. 54-10-2 avant le 30 décembre 2024 jusqu'à ce qu'ils aient été autorisés à fournir des services sur crypto-actifs conformément à l'article 59 du règlement (UE) 2023/1114”
Deadline type
“Pour les besoins de l'application de la période transitoire prévue par le règlement (UE) 2023/1114 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 31 mai 2023 sur les marchés de crypto-actifs”
Requires AML / KYT
“L'établissement de crédit n'est pas en mesure de satisfaire aux obligations prévues à l'article L. 561-5 ou à l'article L. 561-5-1 à l'égard de ces prestataires”
source ↗French CGI Article 200 C — Prélèvement Forfaitaire Unique (PFU / flat tax) on capital gains; since 2026-01-01 the rate is 31.4% (12.8% IR + 18.6% prélèvements sociaux)
statute · Parlement · —· 1/1 anchored
Implementing
Scope: This article of the French General Tax Code (CGI) establishes the flat tax rate on capital gains. A new rate of 31.4% will become effective on January 1, 2026.
Evidence (1) — verbatim quotes from the source
Status
“since 2026-01-01 the rate is 31.4%”
source ↗French Law n° 2023-171 of 9 March 2023 (DDADUE) — sets the PSAN→PSCA transition regime; authorizes legislation by ordonnance
statute · Parlement · 2023-03-09· 3/3 anchored
LicensingImplementing
Scope: This law establishes the transitional framework for existing French Digital Asset Service Providers (PSANs) to become compliant with the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation.
Gap or ambiguity: The law authorizes the government to issue detailed rules via subsequent 'ordonnances', meaning the full scope of technical and operational obligations for the transition is not yet fully defined.
Evidence (3) — verbatim quotes from the source
Regime
“(regime: `licenciamento`, status: `em_implementacao`)”
Status
“(regime: `licenciamento`, status: `em_implementacao`)”
Deadline type
“sets the PSAN→PSCA transition regime”
source ↗French Law n° 78-17 of 6 January 1978 (Informatique et Libertés) — French data-protection complement to GDPR; CNIL supervision applies to PSCA KYC/onboarding
statute · Parlement · 1978-01-06· 3/8 anchored
In force2019-06-01
Scope: This is the French data protection act, which complements the EU's GDPR. It establishes the principles for lawful processing of personal data and defines the powers of the national supervisory authority, the CNIL.
Gap or ambiguity: The law requires 'appropriate technical or organizational measures' for data security without prescribing specific standards. The CNIL is empowered to create certification schemes, creating an opportunity for third-party certifiers to provide services based on its approved frameworks.
Evidence (3) — verbatim quotes from the source
Status
“ces dispositions entrent en vigueur en même temps que le décret n° 2019-536 du 29 mai 2019 pris pour l'application de la loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés au 1er juin 2019.”
Principal deadline
“ces dispositions entrent en vigueur en même temps que le décret n° 2019-536 du 29 mai 2019 pris pour l'application de la loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés au 1er juin 2019.”
Deadline type
“ces dispositions entrent en vigueur en même temps que le décret n° 2019-536 du 29 mai 2019 pris pour l'application de la loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés au 1er juin 2019.”
source ↗French CGI Article 92 (2, 1° bis) — since 2023-01-01, habitual/professional crypto trading is taxed as BNC (Bénéfices Non Commerciaux), not BIC; mining may also fall under this regime
statute · Parlement · —· 1/1 anchored
In force
Scope: This statute changes the tax classification for income from habitual or professional crypto-asset trading in France. Such income is now considered non-commercial profits (BNC), and mining may also fall under this regime.
Gap or ambiguity: The text indicates that the application of this tax regime to crypto-mining activities is not definitively established. This creates ambiguity for miners in determining their tax obligations.
Evidence (1) — verbatim quotes from the source
Status
“since 2023-01-01, habitual/professional crypto trading is taxed as BNC (Bénéfices Non Commerciaux)”
source ↗